Explanatory Notes - Specific Anatomical Sites
Explanatory Notes - Specific Anatomical Sites
- Head and Neck Tumours
- Digestive System Tumours
- Lung Tumours
- Tumours of Bone and Soft Tissues
- Skin Tumours
- Breast Tumours
- Gynaecological Tumours
- Urological Tumours
- Ophthalmic Tumours
- Lymphomas
- Appendix
- References
Abstract
This chapter provides additional explanatory information for the general application of TNM providing more precise definitions for anatomical sites/subsites, regional lymph nodes and T, N, and M categories that are generic or ambiguous.1. Head and Neck Tumours
1.1. General1.1.1. Anatomy
A uniform topographic terminology should be used for classification, and the "sites, subsites, adjacent sites and adjacent
structures" should be used as defined in the text.Tumours involving two anatomical sites are classified according to the site in which the greater part of the tumour is located. In invasive tumours with an associated carcinoma in situ, only the invasive component is considered for classification.
Example. Carcinoma with two-thirds in the hypopharynx and one-third in the supraglottis is classified as hypopharynx carcinoma.
1.1.2. Extension to Adjacent Sites
In tumours extending to an adjacent site, differentiation between superficial extension and deep extension is necessary. In
superficial extension, the involvement is limited to the mucosa; in deep extension, muscles, bones or other deep structures
are invaded.Superficial extension to adjacent sites is not considered invasion of adjacent structures (T4).
Example. A tumour extending from the oropharynx to nasopharynx or hypopharynx or to oral cavity and limited to the mucosa (without invasion of muscles, bones or other deep structures) is classified only according to size. The involvement of nasopharynx or hypopharynx or oral cavity is not considered invasion of adjacent structures as long as the tumour is limited to the mucosa.
Deep extension to an adjacent site can be the result of vertical invasion of adjacent structures (see above) or the result of horizontal spread not limited to the mucosa but also involving muscles or bones. Such extension is classified as invasion of adjacent structures (T4).
Example. Base of tongue carcinoma invading the preepiglottic space is classified as T4.
1.1.3. Adjacent Structures
Adjacent structures refer to organs and tissues that can be deeply invaded by a tumour, e.g., extension of a glottis carcinoma
through thyroid cartilage into soft tissues of the neck or extension of a carcinoma of the maxillary sinus into the orbit.1.1.4. Regional Lymph Nodes
According to the TNM Atlas [31] the cervical lymph nodes include the following groups (Figs. 2 and 3. See also Fig. 1, p. 22 of the AJCC manual [1]):
| 1. |
Submental nodes (Level IA)
|
| 2. |
Submandibular nodes (syn. submaxillary nodes) (Level IB)
|
| 3. |
Cranial jugular (deep cervical) nodes (Level II)
|
| 4. |
Medial jugular (deep cervical) nodes (Level III)
|
| 5. |
Caudal jugular (deep cervical) nodes (Level IV)
|
| 6. |
Dorsal cervical (superficial cervical) nodes along the spinal accessory nerve (Level V)
|
| 7. |
Supraclavicular nodes (Level IV and, uncommonly, Level V)
|
| 8. |
Prelaryngeal and paratracheal (syn. anterior cervical) nodes (Level VI)
|
| 9. |
Retropharyngeal nodes
|
| 10. |
Parotid nodes
|
| 11. |
Buccal nodes (syn. facial nodes)
|
| 12. |
Retroauricular (syn. mastoid, posterior auricular) and occipital nodes
|
|
Figure 2. Cervical lymph node groups [31] [Full View] |
|
Figure 3. Subdivision of prelaryngeal and paratracheal (anterior cervical) lymph nodes (group 8). [Full View] |
In 1991, a standardized neck dissection terminology was published by a Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology of the American Academy for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [24]. In October 1992, at an international symposium in Göttingen, Germany, this terminology was accepted by representatives of various European cancer centers (Villejuif, Milan, Amsterdam). We support the use of this terminology [24]. The lymph node groups 1-8 are defined as follows:
| 1. |
Submental group (Level IA):
Lymph nodes within the triangular boundary of the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and the hyoid bone.
|
|||||||||||
| 2. |
Submandibular group (Level IB):
Lymph nodes within the boundaries of the anterior and posterior bellies of the digastric muscle and the body of the mandible.
|
|||||||||||
| 3. |
Upper jugular group (Level II):
Lymph nodes located around the upper third of the internal jugular vein and adjacent spinal accessory nerve, extending from
the hyoid bone (clinical landmark) to the skull base. The posterior boundary is the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid
muscle, and the anterior boundary is the lateral border of the sternohyoid muscle. This group includes the jugulodigastric
node, which is the most cranial jugular node.
|
|||||||||||
| 4. |
Middle jugular group (Level III):
Lymph nodes located around the middle third of the internal jugular vein, extending from the carotid bifurcation superiorly
to the omohyoid muscle (surgical landmark) or cricothyroid notch (clinical landmark) inferiorly. The posterior boundary is
the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and the anterior boundary is the lateral border of the sternohyoid
muscle. This group includes the juguloomohyoid node located between omohyoid muscle and internal jugular vein.
|
|||||||||||
| 5. |
Lower jugular group (Level IV):
Lymph nodes located around the lower third of the internal jugular vein, extending from the omohyoid muscle superiorly to
the clavicle inferiorly. The posterior boundary is the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and the anterior
boundary is the lateral border of the sternohyoid muscle.
|
|||||||||||
| 6. |
Dorsal cervical nodes along the spinal accessory nerve (Level V) and
|
|||||||||||
| 7. |
Supraclavicular nodes (mostly Level IV):
The two groups are combined and called the "posterior triangle group": This comprises predominantly the lymph nodes located
along the lower half of the spinal accessory nerve and the transverse cervical artery. The supraclavicular nodes are also
included. The posterior boundary is the anterior border of the trapezius muscle, the anterior boundary is the posterior border
of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, and the inferior border is the clavicle. Most are in Level IV; some may occupy the most
caudal component of Level V.
|
|||||||||||
| 8. |
Anterior compartment group (Level VI):
Lymph nodes surrounding the midline visceral structures of the neck, extending from the level of the hyoid bone superiorly
to the suprasternal notch inferiorly. On each side, the lateral boundary is the medial border of the carotid sheath. Located
within this compartment are the perithyroidal lymph nodes, paratracheal lymph nodes, lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal
nerves and precricoid lymph nodes.
Node group 8 (prelaryngeal and paratracheal nodes) may be further subdivided as follows (Figure 3):
|
|||||||||||
| 9. |
Retropharyngeal nodes
|
|||||||||||
| 10. |
The parotid nodes may be subdivided into superficial (in front of tragus on top of parotid fascia) and deep parotid nodes. The latter are located
underneath the parotid fascia and include intraglandular nodes directly in parotid gland. The preauricular and infra-auricular
(infra- or subparotid) nodes are assigned to the parotid nodes.
|
|||||||||||
| 11. |
The buccal (facial) nodes include the buccinator nodes located deep on buccinator muscle, the nasolabial nodes located underneath nasolabial groove,
the molar nodes located in the surface of cheek and the mandibular nodes located outside the lower jaw.
|
For thyroid surgery, a distinction between a central and a lateral compartment is of interest for treatment planning [5]. The central compartment includes groups 1, 2 and 8, the lateral compartment groups 3-7.
The regional lymph nodes for thyroid include the upper mediastinal lymph nodes, which may be subdivided into tracheo-oesophageal (posterior mediastinal) and upper anterior mediastinal nodes. Cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes are not divided by a fascia; the left brachiocephalic vein is considered to be the boundary [5].
1.1.5. N Classification
Size of Lymph Nodes: In advanced lymphatic spread, one often finds perinodal tumour and the confluence of several lymph node metastases into
one large tumour conglomerate. In the definition of the N classification, the perinodal component should be included in the
size for isolated lymph node metastases; for conglomerates, the overall size of the conglomerate should be considered and
not only the size of the individual lymph nodes.1.2. Lip and Oral Cavity
Summary Lip, Oral Cavity
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
1.2.1. Lip
Tumours that affect the vermilion surface as well as the skin are assigned to the lip when 50% or more of the tumour is within
the vermilion surface.The vermilion surface is demarcated from the mucosal surface by the line of contact of the opposing lips.
Skin of face is not classified as an adjacent structure.
Invasion up to cortical bone or erosion of the bone is not classified T4. There must be invasion through the cortical bone into the spongiosa.
1.2.2. Oral Cavity
| 1. |
T4 definitions:
|
||||||||
| 2. |
A tumour extending from the oral cavity to the oropharynx and limited to the mucosa (without invasion of muscles, bones or
other deep structures) is classified only according to size. The involvement of oropharynx is not considered invasion of adjacent
structures as long as the tumour is limited to the mucosa.
|
1.3. Pharynx
1.3.1. Oropharynx
Summary Oropharynx
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
A tumour extending from the oropharynx to the nasopharynx or to the hypopharynx or to the oral cavity or larynx and limited to the mucosa (without invasion of muscles, bones or other deep structures) is classified only according to size up to T3. The involvement of nasopharynx or hypopharynx or oral cavity or larynx is not considered invasion of adjacent structures provided that the tumour is limited to the mucosa.
A tumour invading soft tissue of neck and paravertebral fascia/muscles is classified as T4.
Definition of invasion of the larynx: Invasion of outer framework (thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, preepiglottic space) or internal structures such as arytenoid and epiglottic cartilages.
1.3.2. Nasopharynx
Summary Nasopharynx
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Tumours not involving the oropharynx and/or nasal fossa but with parapharyngeal extension are classified T2b.
The term "postnasal space" corresponds to nasopharynx (C11). Invasion of vertebral bodies is classified T3.
The terms masticator space and infratemporal fossa are considered synonymous here.
1.3.3. Hypopharynx
Summary Hypopharynx
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
| 1. |
The term "laryngopharynx" corresponds to hypopharynx (C13.9).
|
||||||
| 2. |
For classification, the hypopharyngeal surface of the aryepiglottic fold (C13.1) belongs to the hypopharynx, whereas the laryngeal
aspect of the aryepiglottic fold (C32.1) is part of the supraglottis.
|
||||||
| 3. |
Fixation of hemilarynx is diagnosed endoscopically by immobility of the arytenoid or vocal cord.
|
||||||
| 4. |
The uncommon tumours limited to one subsite but with vocal cord fixation should be classified as T3.
|
||||||
| 5. |
Involvement of the arytenoid cartilage is classified as T3, not T4.
|
||||||
| 6. |
Invasion of adjacent structures (T4) includes
|
||||||
| 7. |
A tumour extending from the hypopharynx to oesophagus and limited to the mucosa (without invasion of muscles, bones or other
deeper structures) is classified only according to size up to T3.
|
||||||
| 8. |
A tumour of the sinus piriformis (C12.9) with invasion of the thyroid cartilage should not be classified as T4 but rather
as T3.
|
1.3.4. Larynx
Summary Larynx
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.3.5. Anatomical Definitions
1.3.5.1. Superior and Inferior Boundaries of the Glottis
According to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [1], the inferior boundary of the supraglottis is the horizontal plane passing through the lateral margin of the ventricle at
its junction with the superior surface of the vocal cord. Kleinsasser [19, 20] emphasized embryological and functional reasons for the following definition of the boundary between supraglottis and glottis:A plane running horizontally through the opening of the ventricle, posteriorly over the vocal process of the arytenoid cartilage and then rising between the cuneiform and the corniculate cartilage to end over the upper edge of the posterior commissure.
According to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual [1], the lower boundary of the glottis is the horizontal plane 1 cm below the lateral margin of the ventricle.
According to Alberti u. Boyce [2] the following definition is recommended: The inferior boundary of the glottis is a horizontal plane 1 cm inferior to the level of the upper surface of the vocal cords, which divides supraglottis and glottis (Fig. 54 TNM Atlas 1997 [31]).
1.3.6. Pathological Criteria of Impaired Vocal Cord Mobility or Vocal Cord Fixation
1.3.6.1. Impaired Mobility or Fixation
For pathological classification concerning impaired mobility or fixation of vocal cords the information from the clinical
T is used for the pathologic T. This is in accordance with TNM rule No. 2, pathological classification "is based on the evidence
acquired before treatment, supplemented or modified by the additional evidence acquired from surgery and from pathological
examination".1.3.7. Associated Carcinoma In Situ
| 1. |
For invasive carcinoma, the classification according to horizontal spread is based only on the invasive component.
|
| 2. |
To indicate the presence of associated carcinoma in situ (adjacent or separate) the suffix "(is)" may be added to the respective
T category of the invasive carcinoma, e.g., T2(is). The presence of an associated carcinoma in situ influences treatment of
the invasive carcinoma and needs identification and separate analysis of such cases.
|
1.3.8. Paranasal Sinuses
Summary Maxillary Sinus
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Summary Ethmoid Sinus
Erosion of bone indicates that the tumour invades the cortex only; invasion of bone indicates that the spongiosa is involved.|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
1.3.9. Salivary Glands
Summary Salivary Glands
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Tumours arising in minor salivary glands localized to the mucous membrane of the upper aerodigestive tract are classified according to the rules for tumours of the oral cavity or pharynx.
Designation by histological type should be done to permit separation of squamous mucosal tumours from salivary gland tumours.
2. Digestive System Tumours
2.1. Rules for Classification
The classification applies to all types of carcinoma including small cell carcinoma. It does not apply to carcinoids.2.2. Oesophagus
Summary Oesophagus
There is a proposal to divide carcinomas of the oesophago-gastric junction region into three entities [27, 28]:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| · |
adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction = AEG I, Barrett)
|
| · |
"real" carcinoma of the cardia (AEG II)
|
| · |
subcardial carcinoma of the stomach, infiltrating the distal oesophagus (AEG III)
|
For tumours of the lower and upper oesophagus, the categories M1a and M1b are provided:
| Lower thoracic oesophagus: | |
| M1a |
Metastasis in coeliac lymph nodes
|
| M1b |
Other distant metastasis
|
| Upper thoracic oesophagus: | |
| M1a |
Metastasis in cervical lymph nodes
|
| M1b |
Other distant metastasis
|
2.3. Stomach
2.3.1. Anatomy
Gastric tumours located in the cardiac area may involve the distal oesophagus and primary oesophageal tumours may involve
the cardiac area of the stomach. For differentiation between oesophageal and gastric carcinomas the following may be considered:
| · |
If more than 50% of the tumour involves the oesophagus, the tumour is classified as oesophageal; if less than 50%, as gastric
|
| · |
If the tumour is equally located above and below the oesophagogastric junction or is designated as being at the junction,
squamous cell, small cell and undifferentiated carcinomas are classified as oesophageal, adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell
carcinoma as gastric
|
| · |
In the presence of Barrett oesophagus, an adenocarcinoma in both cardia and lower oesophagus is most likely to be oesophageal.
In the absence of Barrett oesophagus such an adenocarcinoma is most likely to be gastric.
|
2.3.2. Regional Lymph Nodes
The regional lymph nodes are:
| · |
The perigastric nodes along the lesser curvature
|
|||||||||||||
| · |
The perigastric nodes along the greater curvature
|
|||||||||||||
| · |
The nodes located along the main trunks of the following arteries
|
2.3.3.1. Perigastric Lymph Nodes
|
2.3.3.2. Lymph Nodes of the Gastric Bed
|
Stations 7, 8, 9 and 11 include only lymph nodes along the main trunk of the mentioned arteries. Lymph nodes along the ramifications of the left gastric artery are classified as perigastric nodes.
In case of gastric stump carcinoma (after previous distal gastrectomy and localized at the anastomosis), lymph nodes in the mesentery of the intestinal loop used for anastomosis are classified as gastric regional nodes.
In case of invasion of the oesophagus the infradiaphragmatic lymph nodes (no. 19) and the lymph nodes of the oesophageal hiatus (no. 20) are considered as additional regional lymph nodes [18].
2.3.4. T Classification
Summary Stomach
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Invasion of the transverse mesocolon is considered analogous to invasion of the gastrocolic ligament and is therefore classified T2 if the covering visceral peritoneum is not perforated (see TNM Classification 1997 [30], Note 1, p. 60). The same applies to direct invasion of the greater omentum. Tumour nodules in the greater omentum that are separate from the primary tumour are classified as distant (peritoneal) metastasis (M1 PER).
2.4. Small Intestine
Summary Small Intestine
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
The very uncommon carcinoma in a Meckel diverticulum may be classified according to the classification for small intestine carcinoma, although supporting data are not available.
Intramural extension of an ileal carcinoma directly into the caecum (not by way of the serosa) does not affect the T classification, in particular does not qualify for T4.
2.5. Colon and Rectum
2.5.1. Anatomical Sites and Subsites
| 1. |
A tumour located at the border between two subsites is registered as a tumour of the subsite that is more involved.
Example. Carcinoma with a longitudinal diameter of 6 cm, 2 cm in the caecum, 4 cm in the ascending colon, is classified as a carcinoma
of the ascending colon (C18.2).
If two subsites are involved to the same extent, the lesion is classified as an overlapping lesion.
Example. If the carcinoma involves 2 cm of the caecum and 2 cm of the ascending colon, the code C18.8 (overlapping lesion of the colon)
is used.
|
| 2. |
The rectum is defined as the distal large intestine commencing opposite the sacral promontory and ending at the upper border
of the anal canal. When measured from below with a rigid sigmoidoscope, it extends 16 cm from the anal verge. A tumour is
classified as rectal if its lower margin lies 16 cm or less from the anal verge [6, 29]. A tumour is considered rectal if any part is located at least partly within the supply of the superior rectal artery. Tumours
are classified as rectosigmoid when differentiation between rectum and sigmoid according to the above rules is not possible.
|
2.5.2. Local Recurrence
A local recurrence after previous colon resection should be classified with the prefix "r" (for recurrence); the recurrent
tumour is topographically assigned to the proximal segment of the anastomosis.2.5.3. Regional Lymph Nodes
For each anatomical subsite the nodes along the following vessels (trunks and branches) are regional nodes:
|
Metastasis in nodes other than those listed above is classified as distant metastasis, e.g., metastasis in a node along the trunk of the middle colic artery and/or its ramification in a case of rectal carcinoma is M1. However, in case of direct (intramural) extension of the primary tumour to an adjacent subsite, the lymph nodes of the latter subsite are also considered regional lymph nodes.
Perirectal nodes include the mesorectal (paraproctal), lateral sacral, presacral, sacral promotory (Gerota), middle rectal (haemorrhoidal) and inferior rectal (haemorrhoidal) nodes. Metastasis in the external iliac or common iliac nodes is classified as distant metastasis (M1).
The pericolic nodes correspond to "epicolic," "paracolic" and "intermediate" nodes according to the division of Jamieson and Dobson [16] ("epicolic," and the colon itself; "paracolic" along the marginal artery and between it and the colon; "intermediate" nodes on the branches of the major colic vessels as well as nodes along the trunks of these vessels). The "principal glands" of Jamieson and Dobson include the nodes on the inferior mesenteric artery and on the superior mesenteric artery, the latter to be classified as nonregional.
In case of direct invasion of the small intestine, lymph nodes in the mesentery of the invaded intestinal loop are classified as regional lymph nodes.
Summary Colon and Rectum
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Tumours of the appendix are classified using the TNM scheme for colon and rectum, but are analyzed separately.
According to a proposal of the AJCC (Yarbro et al., AJCC on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference. Cancer 1999; 86: 2436-2446) the classification should not be applied to tumours of the appendix.
| 1. |
For colon and rectum only, Tis/pTis (carcinoma in situ) includes cases with invasion of the lamina propria (including the
muscularis mucosae but not of the submucosa), i.e., intramucosal, as well as intraepithelial carcinoma.
|
| 2. |
T3/pT3: The perirectal tissue includes the mesorectum (paraproctium).
|
| 3. |
Tumour extension into the peritoneal cavity is classified as T4. Perforation of the visceral peritoneum at the microscopic
level requires identification of tumour directly extending to and growing on the peritoneal surface and/or positive cytology
on specimens obtained by scraping the serosa overlying the primary tumour [32].
|
| 4. |
Intramural direct extension from one subsite (segment) of the colon to an adjacent one is not considered in the T classification. The
same applies to intramural direct extension from the rectum to the sigmoid colon and vice versa and from the rectum to the anal canal.
|
| 5. |
Intramural extension of a caecal carcinoma directly into the ileum (not by way of serosa) does not affect the T classification, in particular
does not qualify for T4. In contrast, direct extension via serosa or via mesocolon is classified T4, e.g., extension of a
sigmoid colon carcinoma to caecum.
|
| 6. |
Tumour cells in veins or lymphatics do not affect the pT classification. The L and V classifications can be used to record
such spread (see also N/pN classification).
Example. Carcinoma with continuous local spread into the submucosa, tumour cells in a small vein within the muscularis propria - pT1,
V1 (muscularis propria).
|
| 7. |
Invasion of the external sphincter should be classified as pT3.
|
| 8. |
Invasion of levator muscle(s) is classified as T4.
|
| 9. |
A tumour nodule in the soft tissues beneath a perineal operation skin scar after abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma
after a disease-free interval is classified as rT(+) not M1.
|
A tumour nodule greater than 3 mm in the perirectal or pericolic adipose tissue of a primary carcinoma without histological evidence of residual lymph node in the nodule is classified in the pN category as a regional lymph node metastasis if the nodule has the form and smooth contour of a lymph node. If the nodule has an irregular contour, it should be classified in the T or pT category and also coded as V1 (microscopic venous invasion) or V2, if it was grossly evident, because there is a strong likelihood that it arises from venous invasion. [12-14].
Involvement of the apical node(s) does not influence the N/pN classification.
2.5.6. M Classification
Tumour nodule(s) in an abdominal scar after removal of an intraabdominal tumour (with a disease-free interval) should be classified
as M1, e.g., rT0 N0 M1 SKI.2.6. Anal Canal
2.6.1. Rules for Classification
The classification applies to all types of carcinoma including those arising within an anorectal fistula as well as squamous
cell (cloacogenic) carcinoma.2.6.2. T Classification
Summary Anal Canal
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Involvement of the sphincter muscle(s) alone is not classified as T4.
Direct invasion of rectal wall or perirectal skin or subcutaneous perianal tissue is not considered T4. The tumour is classified by size.
2.7. Liver
2.7.1. Rules for Classification
The classification applies to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (peripheral bile duct carcinoma) as well as hepatocellular carcinoma
and combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma.2.7.2. Regional Lymph Nodes
The regional lymph nodes are the hilar, hepatic (along the proper hepatic artery) and periportal (along the portal vein) nodes.
In addition, the nodes along the abdominal inferior vena cava above the renal veins, except the inferior phrenic nodes are
considered regional. Involvement of the inferior phrenic nodes (lymph nodes in the oesophageal hiatus of the diaphragm) should
be considered M1. This expands the definition of regional nodes described in the original printing of the 5th edition of TNM and corresponds to the definition in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. It is supported by a study of Nozaki
et al. [22].Summary Liver
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
| 1. |
"Multiplicity" includes multiple nodules representing multiple, independent primary tumours and intrahepatic metastasis from
a single primary hepatic carcinoma
|
| 2. |
"Vascular invasion" is diagnosed clinically by imaging procedures. In the pathological assessment it includes gross and/or
histological involvement of vessels including invasion of adventitia of major branches of vessels,
|
| 3. |
T4: "major branches of the portal or hepatic veins" are the right and left branches of the portal vein and the corresponding
hepatic veins (not segmental or subsegmental branches). Involvement of the right, left and (not always existent) intermediate
branches of the hepatic artery is also classified T4.
|
2.8. Gallbladder
Summary Gallbladder
Carcinoma of the cystic duct is classified as a tumour of the extrahepatic bile ducts.|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
2.9. Extrahepatic Bile Ducts
Summary Extrahepatic Bile Ducts
Carcinoma of the cystic duct and carcinoma in a choledochal cyst are classified as extrahepatic bile duct tumours.|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
This classification does not apply to carcinomas of the ampulla of Vater.
2.9.1. Anatomical Subsites
The extrahepatic bile ducts include:
| · |
Left and right hepatic ducts (tumours arising here are often referred to as hilar carcinomas of the liver, also named Klatskin
tumours)
|
| · |
Common hepatic duct
|
| · |
Cystic duct
|
| · |
Common bile duct (choledochus)
|
2.10. Ampulla of Vater
The ampulla opens into the duodenum through a small mucosal elevation, the duodenal papilla or papilla of Vater. Tumours of
the ampulla of Vater include tumours arising in the ampulla, tumours arising on the papilla and tumours arising at the junction
of the mucosa of the ampulla with that of the papilla.2.11. Pancreas (Exocrine Tumours Only)
This classification is not applicable to tumours in aberrant pancreatic tissue.Summary Pancreas
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
2.11.1. T Classification
| T3 |
Peripancreatic tissues include the surrounding retroperitoneal fat (retroperitoneal soft tissue or retroperitoneal space),
including the mesentery (mesenteric fat), mesocolon, greater and lesser omentum and peritoneum.Direct invasion to bile ducts
and duodenum includes involvement of the ampulla of Vater.
|
| T4 |
Adjacent large vessels are the portal vein, the coeliac artery and the superior mesenteric and common hepatic arteries and
veins.
|
2.11.2. Regional Lymph Nodes
There are some differences in the designation of regional lymph nodes between the UICC and AJCC classifications, see appendix.3. Lung
3.1. Rules for Classification
The classification applies to all types of carcinoma including small cell carcinoma. It does not apply to carcinoids.3.2. T Classification
Summary Lung
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
| 1. |
Tumour with local invasion of another lobe without tumour on the pleural surface should be classified as T2.
|
||||||||||||
| 2. |
Invasion of phrenic nerve is classified as T3.
|
||||||||||||
| 3. |
Vocal cord paralysis (resulting from invasion of the recurrent branch of the vagus nerve), superior vena caval obstruction
or compression of the trachea or oesophagus is classified as T4.
|
||||||||||||
| 4. |
T4: the "great vessels" are
|
||||||||||||
| 5. |
Direct extension to parietal pericardium is classified T3 and to visceral pericardium, T4.
|
||||||||||||
| 6. |
Pleural effusion is classified as T4, unless there are multiple negative cytological examinations.
|
||||||||||||
| 7. |
Tumour foci in the ipsilateral parietal and visceral pleura that are discontinuous from direct pleural invasion by the primary
tumour are classified T4.
|
||||||||||||
| 8. |
Invasion of visceral pleura (T2) includes not only perforation of the mesothelium but also invasion of the lamina propria
serosae.
|
||||||||||||
| 9. |
Tumour extending to rib is classified as T3.
|
||||||||||||
| 10. |
Pericardial effusion is classified the same as pleural effusion.
|
||||||||||||
| 11. |
Multiple tumours of the same histological type in the same lobe is T4, but in different lobes is M1.
|
||||||||||||
| 12. |
Multiple tumours of different histologic type in the same lobe or in different lobes should be classified as T1-4(m).
|
3.3. M Classification
Discontinuous tumours outside the parietal pleura in the chest wall or in the diaphragm are classified M1.3.4. Small Cell Carcinoma
The TNM classification and stage grouping should be applied to small cell carcinoma. TNM is of significance for prognosis
of small cell carcinoma [21], and has the advantage of providing a uniform detailed classification of tumour spread. The former categories "limited"
and "extensive" for small cell carcinoma have been inconsistently defined and used.The category "limited disease"" as used in the Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Study Group system for classification of small cell carcinoma [15] corresponds to stages I to III A and "extensive disease" to stages III B ("extensive disease I") and IV ("extensive disease II").
4. Tumours of the Bone and Soft Tissue
4.1. Bone Tumours
Summary Bone
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
"Skip" metastasis in the same bone as the primary is not considered in the TNM classification. Metastasis in another bone is classified as distant metastasis.
4.2. Soft Tissue Tumours
Summary Soft Tissue Sarcoma
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
A TNM classification and stage grouping of Kaposi sarcoma are not provided. The prognosis of Kaposi sarcoma associated with AIDS is determined by AIDS.
5. Skin Tumours
5.1. Carcinoma of Skin
Summary Skin Carcinoma
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
| 1. |
The classification applies to any type of skin carcinoma including squamous cell, basal cell, skin appendages (e.g. sweat
glands), Merkel cell.
|
| 2. |
The classification does not apply to carcinomas of the eyelid, vulva and penis, which have separate classifications.
|
| 3. |
In carcinoma of the perianal skin (anal margin), direct invasion of the mucosa or submucosa of the anal canal does not affect
the T/pT classification. The tumour is classified by size.
|
| 4. |
Invasion of the galea aponeurotica (aponeurosis epicranialis) is classified as T4.
|
| 5. |
Metastastic involvement of iliac and other pelvic, abdominal or intrathoracic lymph nodes is classified as Ml.
|
5.2. Malignant Melanoma of Skin
Summary Malignant Melanoma
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
5.2.1. Rules for Classification
The classification applies to malignant melanoma of skin of all sites, including eyelid, vulva, penis and scrotum. It does
not apply to melanomas arising in mucous membranes (oral cavity, nasopharynx, vagina, urethra, anal canal) or to melanomas
of the conjunctiva and uvea. The last two sites have separate classifications. There is no classification for melanoma of
the oral cavity, nasopharynx or other visceral sites.Three histological criteria are considered:
| · |
Maximum tumour thickness (Breslow) according to the largest vertical dimension of the tumour in millimetres.
Maximum thickness of the tumour is measured with an ocular micrometer after embedding in paraffin at right angles to the adjacent
normal skin. The upper reference point is the top of the granular cell layer of the epidermis of the overlying skin or the
base of the ulcer if the tumour is ulcerated. The lower reference point is usually the deepest point of invasion. It may be
the invading edge of a single tumour mass or an isolated cell or group of cells deep to the main mass. Melanoma cells within
the epithelium of structures such as hair follicles and sebaceous glands of the skin are not taken into consideration.
|
| · |
Clark levels.
|
| · |
Absence or presence of satellites within 2 cm of the primary tumour.
"Satellites" include tumour nests and nodules not only in the dermis but also in the subcutaneous tissue.
|
The definitive pT category is based on these three criteria.
In case of discrepancy between tumour thickness and level, the pT category is based on the less favourable finding.
5.2.3. N Classification
In-transit metastases with regional lymph node metastasis 3 cm or less in greatest dimension are classified N2b.
A completely different TNM classification and stage grouping have been proposed by the AJCC. It cannot be directly compared with the present classification because different criteria for T, N, and M are used. Comparative testing is recommended.
6. Breast Tumours
6.1. Rules for Classification
| 1. |
The classification applies to carcinomas of the male as well as of the female breast.
|
| 2. |
The rules for multiple simultaneous primary cancers in one breast (general rule No. 5, p. 3) do not apply to a single grossly
detected tumour associated with multiple separate microscopic foci (satellites).
|
| 3. |
According to the proposals of the AJCC (Yarbro et al., see p. 38) LCIS should be dropped from Tis.
|
6.2. Regional Lymph Nodes
Intramammary lymph nodes are coded as axillary lymph nodes level I.6.3. T Classification
Summary Breast
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 1. | |
| 2. |
Only clinically/grossly detected satellite skin nodules are classified T4b (histologically detected foci are not considered).
|
| 3. |
Dimpling of the skin, nipple retraction, nipple involvement or other skin changes, except those in T4b and T4d, may occur
in Tl, T2 or T3 without affecting the classification. This also applies to microscopic invasion of the skin (dermis) without
changes of T4b or T4d.
|
| 4. |
On mastectomy specimens oedema of the skin (T4b) may be inapparent at the time of pathological examination. Therefore, the
surgeon should inform the pathologist of such a clinical finding to guarantee its consideration and to prevent pathological
understaging.
|
| 5. |
Invasion of lymphatic vessels is not considered in the T category.
|
| 6. |
If there is a clinical picture of inflammatory carcinoma (cT4d), but a biopsy of the skin is negative for tumour and a measurable
breast cancer is present, the pT category is based on the size of the tumour (pT1, 2, or 3).
|
| 7. |
Microscopic involvement of dermal lymphatic vessels by tumour without the clinical picture of inflammatory carcinoma is classified
by the size of the tumour.
|
| 8. |
For T classification the size of a tumour in a biopsy should be added to the size of the tumour in the definitive resection
specimen, if the biopsy specimen has a positive margin.
|
The N classification is done by the clinical and imaging methods usually applied for examination of the axilla. At the present time, special efforts are not required for evaluation of internal mammary lymph nodes (N3).
pN1 (movable nodes) and pN2 (nodes that are fixed to one another or to other structures) are differentiated by macroscopic findings of the pathologist during dissection of the axillary specimen.
Multiple micrometastasis in one axillary lymph node, e.g., 0.09 cm + 0.07 cm + 0.06 cm, should be added up (0.22 cm) and not be considered micrometastasis if larger than 0.2 cm.
Invasion of lymph vessels in the axillary fatty tissue is not considered in the N classification. It can be classified in the L- Lymphatic invasion classification (p. 12, TNM 5th edition).
For axillary nodal metastasis, the size of the metastasis, not the size of the lymph node, determines pN. If the size of the metastasis is unknown or not reported, then the pN subclassification should not be used.
7. Gynaecological Tumours
7.1. Vulva
Summary Vulva
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Invasion of the rectal wall or bladder wall (not mucosa) is classified as T3. Mucosal involvement is T4.
Invasion of the wall (not mucosa) of the upper and lower urethra is classified as T3.
|
Upper urethra corresponds to the proximal half, lower urethra to the distal half.
7.2. Vagina
Summary Vagina
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
"Frozen pelvis" is a clinical term which means that tumour extends to the pelvic wall(s). It is classified as T3.
Invasion of the rectal wall or bladder wall (not mucosa) is classified as T2. Mucosal involvement is T4.
A tumour of the upper two thirds of the vagina with inguinal lymph node metastases, is classified as M1 (Stage IV).
A tumour of the lower third of the vagina with pelvic lymph node metastasis is classified M1 (Stage IV).
7.3. Cervix Uteri
Summary Cervix Uteri
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The FIGO stages are based on clinical staging. TNM categories are based on clinical and/or pathological classification.
In the rare multifocal T1a tumours for the horizontal spread FIGO classifies by the largest focus. This is in accordance with TNM rule No. 5.
The presence of tumour cells in lymphatics (lymph vessels) or veins of the parametrium does not qualify for T2b. T2b is used only for grossly or histologically evident continuous invasion beyond the myometrium.
"Frozen pelvis" is a clinical term which means that tumour extends to the pelvic wall(s), i.e., T3b.
Invasion of the rectal wall or bladder wall (not mucosa) is classified as T3a. Mucosal involvement is T4.
Microscopic lesion greater than T1a2 (FIGO IA2) is classified as T1b1 (FIGO IB1).
Tumour-positive peritoneal fluid, e.g., in the pouch of Douglas, is not considered in the TNM or FIGO classification but should be documented.
7.4. Corpus Uteri
Summary Corpus Uteri
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
T1b is "invades up to or less than one half of myometrium" (FIGO IB "invasion less than half of the myometrium").
T3a or FIGO IIIA includes discontinuous involvement of adnexae or serosa within the pelvis. Invasion of parametria is classified as T3a (FIGO IIIA).
Invasion of the rectal wall or bladder wall (not mucosa) is classified as T3b. Mucosal involvement is T4.
"Frozen pelvis" is a clinical term which means that tumour extends to the pelvic wall(s), i.e., T3b.
There may be a small number of patients with T1 corpus carcinoma who will be treated primarily with radiation therapy. For these cases FIGO recommends clinical classification according to the former FIGO schedule (IA, uterine cavity ≤8 cm in length; IB, uterine cavity >8 cm in length); the use of this staging system must be stated.
7.4.1. Grading
Further notes about grading appeared in the 23rd Annual Report of the FIGO [7].7.5. Ovary
The classification applies to malignant surface epithelial-stromal tumours including those of borderline malignancy or of
low malignant potential (WHO Classification, 2nd edition, Scully 1999 [26]) (corresponding to "common epithelial tumours" according to the terminology of the first edition of the WHO classification
[7,25]).Cases should be separated by histologic type and borderline or invasive nature.
The FIGO stages are based on surgical staging. TNM stages are based on clinical and/or pathological classification.
7.5.1. T Classification
Summary Ovary
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| Tlc |
Rupture of the capsule includes spontaneous rupture as well as rupture caused by the surgeon.
|
| T2,3 |
The "pelvis" includes the true or minor or small as well as the false major or large or false pelvis.
|
| T3 |
Peritoneal metastasis outside the pelvis includes involvement of the omentum. T3 includes multifocal involvement of the peritoneum
in borderline tumours.
|
In case of peritoneal metastasis the greatest horizontal diameter is considered in classification, not the thickness of metastasis.
Microscopic confirmation of a single peritoneal metastasis outside the pelvis, irrespective of the size of the metastasis, is required for T3. For the subdivision, size alone is relevant. Therefore, T3c is appropriate based on the macroscopic assessment by the surgeon even if microscopic confirmation was of a smaller metastasis only.
Primary extraovarian peritoneal carcinoma with or without ovarian involvement is not classified by TNM.
7.5.2. N Classification
Involvement of lymph nodes draining a peritoneal metastasis (T3) (e.g., mesocolic) can be considered regional lymph node metastasis
(N1) rather than distant metastasis (M1).7.5.3. M Classification
In ovary, peritoneal metastasis is not considered distant metastasis, it is classified as T3.7.6. Fallopian Tube
Rules for ovary apply to fallopian tube.7.7. Gestational Trophoblastic Tumours
Histopathological grading is not applicable.| Risk Factors Affecting Staging Include the Following | |
| 1. |
Urinary hCG > 100,000 mIU/ml or serum -hCG > 40,000 mIU/ml)
|
| 2. |
Detection of disease >6 months from termination of antecedent pregnancy
|
Serum hCG could be used as well as urinary hCG.
The following factors should be considered and noted in reporting:
| 1. |
Prior chemotherapy for known gestational trophoblastic disease
|
| 2. |
Placental site tumours should be reported separately
|
| 3. |
Histological verification of the disease is not required, if the hCG is abnormally elevated
|
8. Urological Tumours
8.1. Penis
Erythroplasia of Queyrat is classified as carcinoma in situ (Tis).8.2. Prostate
8.2.1. T Classification
Summary Prostate
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
*Note. The prostate includes a right lobe, a left lobe, and a middle lobe according to the anatomic nomenclature. Therefore "unilateral"
and "bilateral" are equivalent to "one lobe" and "both lobes". Involvement of the lateral lobe and the middle lobe can be
considered T2a (according to TNM rule No. 4).
The prostate capsule is a network of smooth muscle and collagen-rich soft tissue around the prostate. There is no clear fascia.
There is no pT1 category because there is insufficient tissue to assess the highest pT category.
The presence of fatty or skeletal muscle tissue in a needle biopsy is not in itself evidence of invasion through the capsule into adjacent fatty tissue and thus may not be classified as T3.
Prostate carcinoma with invasion of M. sphincter urethrae internus is classified as T4.
According to newer anatomical results there are two sphincters:
|
M.sphincter urethrae externus = M. sphincter urethrae (diaphragmaticae)
|
|
|
M.sphincter urethrae internus = M. sphincter vesicae
|
The invasion of the M.sphincter urethrae as well as the invasion of the M.sphincter vesicae would be equivalent to an invasion of the bladder neck and should be classified as T4.
When a tumour is an incidental finding in transurethral resection (TUR) and after the first TUR a repeated TUR (re-TUR) is performed within 2 months as part of the definitive primary treatment (without following radical prostatectomy), the subdivision into Tla and Tlb should be based on the findings of both TURS.
Examples
| 1. |
First TUR: <5% of tissue resected involved by carcinoma. re-TUR with the same amount of tissue: 10% of tissue involved. Classify
Tlb.
|
| 2. |
First TUR: 10% of tissue resected involved by carcinoma. re-TUR including a threefold amount of tissue: no further tumour
found. Classify Tla.
|
Transitional cell carcinoma of the prostate (prostatic urethra) is classified under urethra, see p. 192 of TNM 5th edition [30].
If a prostate resection specimen is limited to the prostate and does not include the capsule or parts of the capsule (in the apex region), the pT classification cannot be used unless the tumour is clearly surrounded by nontumourous prostate tissue.
Involvement of the prostatic urethra is not considered in the T classification.
"Frozen pelvis" is a clinical term which means that tumour extends to the pelvic wall(s) and is fixed. It is classified as T4.
8.2.2. Histopathological Grading
The Gleason score and Gleason pattern [9] correspond to the grading recommended here as follows:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
8.3. Testis
Summary Testis
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
In case of mixed germ cell tumours, the pT classification is determined by the total tumour. The different components should not be classified separately.
Synchronous bilateral tumours should be staged separately as independent primary tumours.
pT2: Invasion beyond the tunica albuginea includes invasion of any of the following-cremaster muscle, cremaster fascia, testicular portion of the internal or external spermatic fascia, i.e., invasion of the scrotum without the skin. Invasion beyond these structures into the subcutis or cutis of the scrotum is classified as pT4.
pT3: Invasion of the spermatic cord refers to direct extension.
Invasion of lymph vessels or blood vessels means unequivocal vessels lined by an endothelium.
The plexus pampiniformis belongs to the spermatic cord, so invasion should be classified as pT3.
Invasion of spermatic cord can be diagnosed, if tumour is found beyond rete testis and/or epididymis on horizontal cross sections.
8.4. Kidney
8.4.1. T Classification
Summary Kidney
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Invasion of ipsilateral adrenal gland (T3a) refers to direct invasion.
Invasion of "perinephric tissues" (T3a) includes perirenal fat and/or renal sinus (peripelvic) fat [11].
Involvement of the renal vein (T3b) entails tumour grossly extending into the renal vein or its segmental (muscle-containing) branches, or vena cava below diaphragm [11].
Gross invasion of the wall of the vena cava above diaphragm is T3c [11].
Gerota fascia (renal fascia) includes the pre- and retrorenal fascia. Invasion of the peritoneum is invasion beyond the Gerota fascia (prerenal fascia) and is classified as T4.
Bulging of a tumour in the sense of changing the contour of the kidney is not sufficient to be classified as T3 or pT3. Penetration of the kidney capsule is needed to classify as T3 or pT3, which should be particularly searched for in the peripelvic fatty tissue.
Invasion (direct spread) of the contralateral adrenal gland is extremely rare and should be classified as M1.
8.5. Renal Pelvis and Ureter
Summary Renal Pelvis, Ureter
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
| 1. |
Direct extension into the urinary bladder in the region of the ostium is classified by the depth of greatest invasion in any
of the involved organs.
|
| 2. |
In tumours of the ureter, adjacent organs include parietal peritoneum.
|
| 3. |
The prognosis of T3 in ureter is worse than in renal pelvis and corresponds approximately to T4 renal pelvis tumours. Therefore,
separate analysis of ureter and renal pelvis carcinoma is recommended [10].
|
| 4. |
For classification of multiple synchronous primary tumours renal pelvis and ureter are considered a single organ. Therefore,
in cases of synchronous tumours in the renal pelvis and the ureter, the tumour with the highest T category should be classified
and the multiplicity or the number of tumours should be indicated in parentheses, e. g., T2(m) or T3(2). In case of multifocal
tumours of renal pelvis and ureter with Ta and Tis tumours, Tis(m) should be classified. In contrast, in case of synchronous
tumours in the renal pelvis and the urinary bladder both tumours should be classified independently.
|
8.6. Urinary Bladder
The classification applies not only to carcinomas (noninvasive or invasive) but also to the newly introduced "Papillary urothelial
(transitional cell) neoplasm of low malignant potential." (see:
Mostofi FK, Davis CJ, Sesterhenn IA (eds) Histological Typing of
Bladder Tumours. 2nd ed. (World Health Organization [WHO]
International Histological Classification of Tumours). Springer:
Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999) Summary Urinary Bladder
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| 1. |
In case of multifocal tumours of urinary bladder with Ta and Tis tumours, Tis(m) should be classified.
|
| 2. |
If the pathology specimen does not contain muscle, the category T1 is applicable (see TNM Classification 1997 [30], General rule No. 4). However, the pathology report should state the absence of muscle to allow the clinician to consider
repeating the biopsy.
|
| 3. |
In case of transurethral resection, differentiation between T2a and T2b is possible only if the surgeon submits the material
as superficial (inner) and deep (outer) portions and histological examination is performed separately. Otherwise, the case
is classified as T2.
|
| 4. |
In some cases (up to 50%) a lamina muscularis mucosae has been described. Invasion of muscularis means lamina muscularis propria.
|
| 5. |
Direct invasion of the distal ureter is classified by the depth of greatest invasion in any of the involved organs.
|
| 6. |
Uncommonly, carcinomas of the bladder show an associated in situ component extending into the prostatic ducts and sometimes
into the prostatic glands (or ureter) without any invasion in the prostate. Such cases are classified according to the depth
of bladder wall invasion. The extension of the associated in situ component into the prostate does not qualify for classification
as T4. It may be indicated by the suffix "(is)", e. g., T2(is). It may be further indicated by the suffix "(is pu)" (extension
into the prostatic urethra) or "(is pd)" (extension into the prostatic ducts), e. g., T2(is pu) or T2 (is pd).
|
| 7. |
Invasion of prostatic urethra (extension of invasive urinary bladder carcinoma into the prostatic urethra with invasion of
the latter) is included in prostatic invasion and therefore classified as T4a.
|
| 8. |
Direct invasion of the large or small intestine should be classified as T4a. The same applies to invasion through the peritoneum
covering the bladder.
|
| 9. |
Invasion of seminal vesicles by bladder tumours should be classified as T4a.
|
8.6.1. Recurrent Carcinoma After Cystectomy and Ureterosigmoidostomy
A recurrent transitional carcinoma in the region of a ureterosigmoidostomy may invade only the subepithelial connective tissue
of the ureter and the adjacent mucosa and submucosa of the sigmoid colon. In this case, the invasion of the colon should not
be considered as invasion of an adjacent organ. For the T classification the rules for ureter and colon should be applied,
i.e., rT1 is the correct classification.8.7. Urethra
8.7.1. T Classification
Summary Urethra
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
In urethral diverticular carcinoma, a differentiation between T2 and T3 is not possible [3]. In this case T2 is used (according to TNM rule No. 4).
9. Ophthalmic Tumours
9.1. Carcinoma of Eyelid
The eyelids are covered externally by epidermis (anterior surface of the eyelid) and internally by conjunctiva (posterior
surface). This classification applies only to the carcinomas of the anterior surface of the eyelid and the eyelid margin.
Carcinomas of the posterior surface of the eyelid are considered under tumours of the conjunctiva.9.2. Carcinoma of Conjunctiva
This classification applies to carcinoma of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva and the conjunctival fornix.9.3. Malignant Melanoma of Conjunctiva
This classification applies to malignant melanoma of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva and the conjunctival fornix.Involvement of eyelid is defined as invasion beyond the tarsal plate into the anterior part of the eyelid.
9.4. Sarcoma of Orbit
In tumours of the orbital soft tissues T3 is used for those with diffuse invasion of the orbit and/or with invasion of the bony walls. In tumours of the orbital bones T3 is used for invasion of
the orbital soft tissues.10. Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
Right or left neck are separate lymph node regions.
| 1. |
Single lymph node regions are:
Bilateral involvement of axilla/arm lymph nodes is considered as involvement of two separate regions. The same applies to
bilateral involvement of inguinal lymph nodes.
Examples
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. |
Direct spread of a lymphoma into adjacent tissues or organs does not influence classification.
Examples
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. |
Involvement of two or more segments of the gastrointestinal tract, isolated and not in continuity, is classified as stage
IV (disseminated involvement of one or more extralymphatic organs).
Example. Involvement of stomach and of ileum-stage IV.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. |
For classification of extranodal lymphomas, involvement of both organs of a paired site is considered as involvement of a
single organ.
Example. Extranodal lymphoma involving both lungs is classified stage IE.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. |
Multifocal involvement of a single extralymphatic organ is classified stage IE and not stage IV.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. |
Primary Extranodal Lymphomas, Stage IIE: The definitions of regional lymph nodes given for the individual tumour sites apply
to extranodal lymphomas, too, e. g., for primary gastric lymphomas the regional lymph nodes are the perigastric nodes along
the lesser and greater curvatures and the nodes located along the left gastric, common hepatic, splenic and coeliac arteries.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. Appendix
Comparison of the regional lymph nodes listed in the UICC [30] and the AJCC TNM 5th editions [1]
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
References
| 1. | AJCC Cancer staging manual. 5th edition. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Kennedy BJ, Murphy GP, O'Sullivan B, Sobin LH, Yarbro JW (eds), Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1997 |
| 2. | Alberti PW, Boyce DB (eds) Workshops from the centennial conference on laryngeal cancer. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, 1976 |
| 3. | Clayton M, Siami F, Guinan P. Urethral diverticular carcinoma. Cancer 1992; 70: 665-670 |
| 4. | De Wolfe CJM, Perry NM (eds) European guidelines for quality assurance in mammography screening. (2nd ed.) European Commission, Brussels, 1996 |
| 5. | Dralle H. Personal communication, 1992 |
| 6. | Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH, et al. Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991; 6: 325-344 |
| 7. | FIGO Annual Report on the Results on the Treatment in Gynaecological Cancer. 23rd vol. Pecorelli S, Boyle P, Odicino F, Sideri M Maisonneuve P, Severi G, Zigliani L (eds) J Epidemiol Biostat 1998; 3: 1-168 |
| 8. | Fornage BD, Tonbas O, Morel M. Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer 1987; 60: 765-771 |
| 9. | Gleason DF, "Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group (VACURG) Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma". In Urologic pathology: the prostate, Tannenbaum M (ed) Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, 1977 |
| 10. | Guinan P, Vogelzang NJ, Randazzo R, et al. Renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma. The role of the kidney in tumor-node-metastasis staging. Cancer 1992; 69: 1773-1775 |
| 11. | Guinan P, Sobin LH, Algaba F, et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma. Report of Workgroup 3. Cancer 1997; 80: 992-993 |
| 12. | Goldstein NS, Turner JR. Pericolonic tumors deposits in patients with T3N+M0 colon adenocarcinomas: a marker for reduced disease-free survival and intra-abdominal metastasis. Cancer 2000; 88: 2228-2238. |
| 13. | Harrison JC, Dean PJ, El-Zeky F, Vander Zwaag R. From Dukes through Jass. Pathological prognostic indicators in rectal cancer. Hum Pathol 1994; 25: 498-505 |
| 14. | Harrison JC, Dean PJ, El-Zeky F, Vander Zwaag R. Impact of the Crohn's like lymphoid reaction on staging of right-sided colon cancer. Results of a multivariate analysis. Hum Pathol 1995; 26: 31-38 |
| 15. | Hyde L, Yee J, Wilson R, Patno ME. Cell type and the natural history of lung cancer. JAMA 1965; 193: 52-54 |
| 16. | Jamieson JK, Dobson JF. The lymphatics of the colon. Proc R Soc Med 1909; 2: 149-152 |
| 17. | Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. (1st English ed.) Nishi M, Omori Y, Miwa K, (eds) Kanehara: Tokyo, 1995 |
| 18. | Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA). Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998; 1: 10-24 |
| 19. | Kleinsasser O. Tumoren des Larynx und des Hypopharynx. Thieme: Stuttgart, 1987 |
| 20. | Kleinsasser O. Revision of classification of laryngeal cancer, is it long overdue? (Proposals for an improved TN-classification) J Laryngol Otol 1992; 106: 197-204 |
| 21. | Mountain CF. Prognostic implications of the international staging system for lung. Semin Oncol 1988; 15: 236-245 |
| 22. | Nozaki Y, Yamamoto M, Ikai, I, et al. Reconsideration of the lymph node metastasis pattern (N factor) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for primary liver carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 83: 1923-1929 |
| 23. | Pain JA, Ebbs SR, Hern RPA, et al. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. Eur J Surg Oncol 1992; 18: 44-48 |
| 24. | Robbins KT, Medina JE, Wolfe GT, et al. Standardizing neck dissection terminology. Official report of the Academy Committee for Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 117: 601-605 |
| 25. | Serov SF, Scully RE, Sobin LH. Histological typing of ovarian tumours (WHO International Histological Classification of Tumours No. 9). World Health Organization: Geneva, 1973 |
| 26. | Scully RE. Histological typing of ovarian tumours (2nd ed.). (WHO International Histological Classification of Tumours). Springer: Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1999 |
| 27. | Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1457-1459 |
| 28. | Siewert JR. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Gastric Cancer 1999; 2: 87-88 |
| 29. | Soreide O, Norstein J, Fielding LP, et al. "International standardization and documentation of the treatment of rectal cancer". In: Rectal cancer surgery, Soreide O, Norstein J (eds). Springer: Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1997, pp. 405-455 |
| 30. | UICC (International Union against Cancer) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. (5th ed.) Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (eds). Wiley-Liss: New York, 1997 |
| 31. | UICC (International Union against Cancer) TNM Atlas. Illustrated Guide to the TNM/pTNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (4th ed. 1997. Corrected second printing 1999). Hermanek P, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH, Wagner G, Wittekind Ch (eds) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York |
| 32. | Zeng Z, Cohen AM, Hajdu S, et al. Serosal cytologic study to determine free mesothelial penetration by intraperitoneal colon cancer. Cancer 1992; 70: 737-740 |
Explanatory Notes-General
References
| 1. | Anneroth G, Hansen LS. A methodologic study of histologic classification and grading of malignancy in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Scand J Dent Res 1984; 92: 448-468 |
| 2. | Anneroth G, Batsakis J, Luna M. Review of the literature and a recommended system of malignancy grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 229-249 |
| 3. | Becker K, Mueller J, Fink U, Matzen K, Sendler A, Dittler HJ, Helmberger H, Siewert JR, Höfler H. "The interpretation of pathologic changes in the resection specimen following multimodal therapy for gastric adenocarcinomas". In Progress in Gastric Cancer Research, Siewert JR, Roder JD (eds) Monduzzi: Bologna, 1997; pp 1275-1280 |
| 4. | Bloom HJG, Richardson WW. Histologic grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1957; 11: 359-377 |
| 5. | Bryne M, Koppang HS, Lilleng R, Stene T, Bang G, Dabelsteen E. New malignancy grading is a better prognostic indicator than Broder's grading in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 1989; 18: 432-437 |
| 6. | Coindre JM, Trojani M, Contesso G et al. Reproducibility of a histopathological grading system for adult soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 1986; 58: 306-309 |
| 7. | Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, Fielding LP. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working group. Cancer 2000; 88: 1739-1757 |
| 8. | Costa J, Wesley RA, Glatstein E, Rosenberg SA. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas: Results of a clinicopathological correlation in a series of 163 cases. Cancer 1982; 53: 530-541 |
| 9. | Dudeck J, Wagner G, Grundmann E, Hermanek P Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tumorzentren (ADT) Qualitätssicherung in der Onkologie. Basisdokumentation für Tumorkranke. Prinzipien und Verschlüsselungsanweisungen für Klinik und Praxis. 5. Aufl., Zuckschwerdt: München Bern Wien New York, 1999 |
| 10. | Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorect Dis 1997; 12: 19-23 |
| 11. | Elston CW, Ellis LO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19: 403-410 |
| 12. | Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Soft tissue tumors, 3rd ed, Mosby, St. Louis, 1995 |
| 13. | Gleason DF, "Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group (VACURG). Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma". In Urologic pathology: the prostate. Tannenbaum M (ed) Lea and Fiebiger: Philadelphia, 1977 |
| 14. | Goldstein NS, Turner JR. Pericolonic tumors deposits in patients with T3N + M0 colon adenocarcinomas: a marker for reduced disease-free survival and intra-abdominal metastasis. Cancer 2000; 88: 2228-2238 |
| 15. | Harrison JC, Dean PJ, El-Zeky F, Vander Zwaag R. From Dukes through Jass. Pathological prognostic indicators in rectal cancer. Hum Pathol 1994; 25: 498-505 |
| 16. | Harrison JC, Dean PJ, El-Zeky F, Vander Zwaag R. Impact of the Crohn's like lymphoid reaction on staging of right-sided colon cancer. Results of a multivariate analysis. Hum Pathol 1995; 26: 31-38 |
| 17. | Henson DE, Ries L, Freedman LS, Carriaga M. Relationship among outcome, stage of disease, and histologic grade for 22 616 cases of breast cancer. Cancer 1991; 68: 2142-2149 |
| 18. | Hermanek P, Wittekind Ch. Residual Tumor (R) Classification and Prognosis. Sem Surg Oncol 1994; 10: 12-20 |
| 19. | Hermanek P, Wittekind C. The pathologist and the Residual Tumor (R) classification. Path Res Pract 1994; 190: 115-123 |
| 20. | Hermanek P, Wittekind Ch, Altendorf-Hofmann A. UICC Classification of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Intern J Pancreatol 1994; 16: 230-232 |
| 21. | Hermanek P, Wittekind Ch. News of TNM and its use for classification of gastric cancer. World J Surg 1995; 19: 491-495 |
| 22. | Hermanek P. pTNM and residual tumour classification: problems and prognostic factors. World J Surg 1995; 19: 184-190 |
| 23. | Hermanek P. "Staging systems. A review". In Rectal cancer surgery. Optimisation-Standardisation-Documentation. Soreide O, Norstein J (eds) Springer: Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, 1997; pp 49-62 |
| 24. | Hermanek P, Bülzebruck H. "Staging des Lungenkarzinoms". In Thoraxtumoren. Diagnostik-Staging-gegenwärtiges Therapiekonzept. Drings P, Vogt-Moykopf I (Hrsg) 2. Aufl. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, 1998 pp 97-117 |
| 25. | Hermanek P, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch. Classification of isolated tumour cells and micrometastasis. Cancer 1999; 86: 2668-2673 |
| 26. | Huvos AG. "Bone tumours. diagnosis, treatment and prognosis". (2nd ed.) Saunders: Philadelphia London Toronto, 1991 |
| 27. | Jaehne J, Meyer HJ, Soudah B, Maschek HJ, Pichlmayr R. Peritoneal lavage in gastric carcinoma. Dig Surg 1989; 6: 26-28 |
| 28. | Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. Guidelines for the clinical and pathologic studies on carcinomas of the esophagus. (8th ed.) Kanehara: Tokyo, 1990 |
| 29. | Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (JRSGC) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. (1st English ed.). Nishi M, Omori Y, Miwa K (eds) Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo, 1995 |
| 30. | Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA). Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer 1998; 1: 10-24 |
| 31. | Jass JR, Sobin LH. "Histological typing of intestinal tumours", 2nd ed. WHO International Histological Classification of Tumours. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1989 |
| 32. | Junker K, Krapp D, Müller KM. Kleinzelliges Bronchialkarzinom nach Chemotherapie-Morphologische Befunde. Pathologe 1995; 16: 217-222 |
| 33. | Junker K, Thomas M, Schulmann K, Klinke V, Borse U, Müller KM. Regressionsgrading neoadjuvant behandelter nichtkleinzelliger Lungenkarzinome. Pathologe 1997; 18: 131-140 |
| 34. | Klimpfinger M, Hauser H, Berger A, Hermanek P. Aktuelle klinische-pathologische Klassifikation von Karzinomen des Analkanals. Acta Chir Aust 1994; 26: 345-351 |
| 35. | Mandard A-M, Dalibard F, Mandard JC, Marnay J, Henry-Amar M, Petiot J-F, Roussel A, et al. Pathologic assessment of tumour regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of oesophgeal carcinoma. Cancer 1994; 73: 2680-2696 |
| 36. | Markhede G, Angervall L, Stener B. A multivariate analysis of the prognosis after surgical treatment of malignant soft tissue tumours. Cancer 1982; 49: 1721-1733 |
| 37. | Martin JK Jr, Goellner JR. Abdominal fluid cytology in patients with gastrointestinal malignant lesions. Mayo Clin Proc 1986; 61: 467-471 |
| 38. | Maruyama K. "Diagnosis of invisible peritoneal metastasis: cytologic examination by peritoneal lavage". In Staging and Treatment of Gastric Cancer. Cordine C, de Manzoni G (eds) Piccin Nuova Libraria: Padua, 1991; pp 180-181 |
| 39. | Müller HA, Altemähr E, Böcking A, Dhom G, Faul P, Göttinger H, Helpap B, Hohbach C, Kastendieck H, Leistenschneider G. Über Klassifikation und Grading des Prostatacarcinomas. Verh Dtsch Ges Path 1980; 64: 609-611 |
| 40. | Müller KM, Wiethege Th, Junker K. Pathologie kleinzelliger Lungentumoren. Onkologe 1998; 4: 996-1001 |
| 41. | Myhre-Jensen O, Kaae S, Hjollund Madsen E, Sneppen O. Histopathological grading in soft tissue tumours: Relation to survival in 261 surgically treated patients. Acta Path Microbiol Immunol Scand (Sect A) 1983; 91: 145-150 |
| 42. | Nakajima T, Harashima S, Hirata M, Kajitani T. Prognostic and therapeutic values of peritoneal cytology in gastric cancer. Acta Cytol 1978; 22: 225-229 |
| 43. | Pantel K, Coste RJ, Fodstad O. Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1113-1124 |
| 44. | Pinder SE, Murray S, Ellis IO, Trihia H, Elston CW, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Lindtner J, Cortés-Funes H, Simoncii E, Byrne MJ, Golouh R, Rudenstam CM, Castiglione-Gertsch M. Gusterson BA. The importance of histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy. Cancer 1998; 83: 1529-1533 |
| 45. | Quirke P, Dixon MF. The prediction of the local recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma by histopathological examination. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988; 3: 127-131 |
| 46. | Quirke P. The pathologist, the surgeon and colorectal cancer-get it right because it matters. Prog Pathol 1998; 4: 201-213 |
| 47. | Salzer-Kuntschik M, Delling G, Beron G, Sigmund R. Morphological grades of regression in osteosarcoma after polychemotherapy-Study Case 80. J Cancer Res Clin Pract 1993; 106, Suppl: 21-24 |
| 48. | Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Gall FP. Indicators of prognosis after hepatic resection for colorectal secondaries. Surgery 1990; 110: 13-29 |
| 49. | Schlimok G, Funke I, Pantel K, et al. Micrometastatic tumour cells in bone marrow of patients with gastric cancer: methodological aspects of detection and clinical significance. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 1461-1465 |
| 50. | Schmidt RA, Conrad EU, Collins C, Rabinovitch P, Finney A. Measurement and prediction of short-term response of soft tissue sarcomas to chemotherapy. Cancer 1993; 72: 2593-2601 |
| 51. | Schnürch HG, Lange C, Bender HG. Vier histopathologische Differenzierungsgrade beim Mammakarzinom? Pathologe 1989; 10: 39-42 |
| 52. | SEER Program: Code manual, Third edition. NIH Publication No 98-2313. National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, 1998. |
| 53. | Sinn HP, Schmid H, Junkermann H, Houber J, Leppien G, Kaufmann M, Bastert G et al. Histologische Regression des Mammakarzinoms nach primärer (neoadjuvanter) Chemotherapie. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 1994; 34: 332-338 |
| 54. | Veronesi U, Farante G, Galimberti V, Greco M, Luini A, Sacchini V, Andreola S, Leoni F, Menard S, Ronco M, Colnaghi MI. Evaluation of resection margins after breast conservative surgery with monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Surg Oncol 1991; 17: 338-341 |
| 55. | Warshaw AL. Implications of peritoneal cytology for staging of early pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 1991; 161: 26-30 |
| 56. | Zeng Z, Cohen AM, Haydu S, Sternberg SS, Sigurdson ER, Enker W. Serosal cytologic study to determine free mesothelial penetration by intraperitoneal colon cancer. Cancer 1992; 70: 737-740 |




<< Home